Glazers out. INEOS out.
BOYCOTT
UNITED
GLAZERS OUT.
INEOS OUT.
This is a Glazers Out and INEOS Out movement. Put calm, public pressure on the sponsors and companies that keep their ownership model moving.
Every action is yours. We never auto-post or auto-reply.
Prepare your words
MAKE IT PERSONAL.
KEEP IT FACTUAL.
Choose where to apply pressure
FOLLOW
THE MONEY.
Never miss a post
Enable browser push and add your email to get a reminder when a monitored account posts.
Club sponsors
Make the badge bad for business.
DOO Group
Global partner
Belstaff
Official outerwear partner
Club merchandise
Stop rewarding the ownership model.
MUTV
Club channel
United Store
Official club shop
INEOS owned
Minority ownership still has a public face.
INEOS Hygienics
Consumer brand
INEOS Styrolution
Chemicals division
Glazer owned
Pressure the wider business network.
Desert Vipers
ILT20 cricket team
Glazer Properties
Family real estate arm
Lancer Capital
Family investment vehicle
Why commercial pressure matters
THE CLUB PAYS.
THE OWNERS TAKE.
Approximate debt placed on Manchester United in the 2005 leveraged takeover.
UK Parliament evidenceDividends paid to shareholders between 2016 and 2022.
BBC Sport reportingInterest and related financing costs paid since the takeover by 2022.
The Guardian analysisThe strategy is simple: make passive association less comfortable. Sponsors value reputation, attention and customer loyalty. Respectful, repeated contact shows that this ownership model carries a cost beyond the stadium.
Go beyond social media
PUT IT
IN WRITING.
Customer service
Subject: Your relationship with Manchester United Hello, I am a Manchester United supporter concerned that your commercial relationship with the club helps sustain the Glazers and INEOS ownership model. Please explain what pressure your company is applying for the Glazers and INEOS to leave, or whether you will reconsider the partnership. Supporters are paying attention to where the money flows. Regards, A Manchester United supporter
Investor relations
Subject: Reputational risk — Manchester United partnership Dear Investor Relations team, I am writing about the reputational risk created by your company’s association with Manchester United under the Glazers and INEOS ownership model. Fan opposition is longstanding and commercially relevant. Please clarify how the board assesses this partnership risk and what engagement has taken place with both ownership groups. Regards, A concerned supporter and consumer
EMAIL A DECISION-MAKER
Select an address to open a new message with the anti-Glazer and INEOS boycott email already drafted. Read it, personalise it, then send it yourself.
Qualcomm / Snapdragon
Adidas
SumUp
SC Holdings
Apollo Tyres
Canon Medical
Casillero del Diablo / VCT Europe
Champions Travel
DHL
DOO Group
Elevate
Extreme Networks
Konami
Malaysia Airlines
Mlily
Paul Smith
Sokin
Heineken
Travel Connection
VisitMalta
Coca-Cola
Hong Kong Jockey Club
Harves
Sýn
GO Malta
Cyta
PCCW / HKT
Spark New Zealand
StarTimes
blue Sport
TV 2 Norway
United Media
Invex
Maybank
INEOS
Belstaff
Petroineos
US Auto Trust
US Property Trust
Glazer Companies
Innovate Corp
DBM Global
MediBeacon
Take it to Instagram
DOWNLOAD THE
FACTS.
Square, sharp and ready to share. Generated in your browser — no tracking, no upload.